My wife and I traveled to Niagara Falls a few years ago in the unexpected month of January. I visited the falls with my family back in the late 70’s. It was (in an overused word in describing the falls) awesome. I don’t remember exactly what time of year I went with my family, but my father worked in the Philadelphia school system so I’m thinking Summer. The weather was gorgeous. My brother and I played on the lawns around the picnic areas, we doned short sleeved shirts, and I think I recall ice cream. In 2009 this was not the case. In the long weekend my wife and I spent in January, the darkness encroached at about 3:30 in the afternoon. The temperatures never peaked above 20 degrees fahrenheit, and the windchill bottomed at the magical number of -40 degrees (magical because -40 is the same temperature in both celsius and fahrenheit). One of the things that really burned in my mind from this trip was that Niagara Falls is still there. Every second of every day between 100,000 and 200,000 cubic feet of water flow over the falls. It happens regardless of the time of day or the season (except on the rare occasion that Niagara freezes over). What I took from this experience and why it stuck with me is because when I saw it as a child I was awestruck, and as an adult I was awestruck. The falls looked as different as could be, and it was a totally different experience each time, yet still indescribably mind blowing. If I would have only seen it in the summer I would have missed seeing the mist frozen against the lamppost pictured below, and if I had only seen it in the Winter I could never have appreciated the cool mist against my face, cooling down an energetic young boy. Each place we visit is unique... and each time is just as special.
It Must be Here
Spring must have sprung, I have sunburn on my face. Over this past weekend I was outside taking soccer portraits and it was windy but there was no rain. It’s still early April so I made the mistake of not applying sunscreen thinking “I’m wearing a long sleeved shirt and a coat, I have my rain covers just in case, and I have food for a long day. I’m covered.” It’s been so long since I needed to shield myself from Apollo’s rays I had forgotten about basic skin protection. It won’t happen again (yeah, right).
Nikon D800 Sigma 85mm f/1.4 @ 85mm f/4 ISO 100 1/640 sec
The Other Way
On Monday I posted April’s desktop calendar. I thought I should show you what was behind me when I took that image. It was a reminder to me to open my eyes, to look around, to not be so immersed in a moment, a view, or an emotion as to not be available for a little serendipity. Have a wonderful weekend.
Nikon D800 Tokina 16-28mm f/2.8 @ 16mm f/18 ISO 100 5 image HDR
It's not Always There
It... that feeling, that introspection, that ephemeral experience. It’s like the mist across water at daybreak. It’s the hint of sunrise from a glow far in the distance. It’s the faint odor of burning embers. It’s the feeling of hairs prickling the back of your neck. It’s subtlety. I search for it in sunrises, the moment when I can’t tell if the sky is blue, violet, indigo, or magenta. It’s the subtle hue of color that is evolving and changing. The more I look for it, examine it, explore it, decompose it, the quicker it vanishes. It’s like trying to grab one handful of water. Elusive. It presents itself in moments of peace, when I am open to it but don’t expect it or label it. Maybe it is always here, but I am not ready for it...
Nikon D800 Tokina 16-28mm f/2.8 @ 18mm f/18 ISO 100 7 image HDR
The use of Photoshop
I use Photoshop. It is an integral part of my photography. I know people who think that’s blasphemy. I want to explain why I don’t. Photoshop is a tool. It is a tool that helps me to create my art. In brief I will say that if a photojournalist is taking pictures then there is no place for photo manipulation. It would be like altering the facts in a court case, but for art I think the benefits strongly outweigh the drawbacks.
With the amazing images modern camera sensors can capture in a split second, and technology improving with every generation, it’s good to question the need for a program like Photoshop. The problem is that cameras are still nowhere good enough to display what the human eye sees. The subtleties of light and color perceived by our optical receptors are astounding. If you want to test this out, next time you take a picture look closely at the back of your camera and compare that image to what is in front of you. The difference is vast. This would be my argument for Photoshop helping to communicate a scene to the final viewer as close as can be to what the original viewer perceived.
Another wonderful part of Photoshop is the ability to enhance an artistic vision. For instance, a picture taken in an ice field could be tinted a little bluer in Photoshop to emote a cooler feeling of the overall image, or heat ripples could be added to convey just how hot the lava was flowing from an active volcano. The possibilities are endless. For this reason I look at pictures in a different way than I used to. Not necessarily skeptically but just accepting them as I see them and not as the scene actually was.
Then we have the crazy putting people's heads on other people, increasing body features, or unrealistically manipulating images that are in no way supposed to be realistic. I compare this to illustrators, or painters, etc. If Monet didn’t like one of the water lilies in the pond he could have left it out of the painting, or added more at his discretion. He could have painted them black, orange or hot pink. For all we know they were really chocolate brown. I have seen some amazing art come from no holds barred Photoshop use, and it is definitely an art form. My skills pale in comparison to many Photoshop users but sometimes making a picture look different from reality is exactly what a client wants. The picture below brought a huge smile to the girl in the picture when she saw it, and I have Photoshop to thank for that.
Nikon D800 Sigma 85mm f/1.4 @ 85mm f/2.5 ISO 800 1/60 sec